Everyone expects a catharsis at
these things. The faces read expectation and the bodies read suspense. The lead
singer, accompanied by a euphoric “wall of sound” is working up the scale to
the climactic high note, his signature falsetto. Everyone knows this particular
note and is waiting to hear it because they have heard the record too. This new
record, Burst Apart, is the
ostensible occasion for the appearance of the band, The Antlers, in Pawtucket,
Rhode Island on this downcast Tuesday evening. The singer, Peter Silberman, donning a bicep accentuating, epaulette
shirt and an oblique haircut likely culled from a jazz age mugshot is ready.
Without hesitation, he achieves the sustaining note. In this moment, the crowd
reaction in the crowd is evident and three-tiered. First is the impressiveness,
the recognizing the record had not deceived them in their expectations. Second
was crowd scanning for the reactions of other in the crowd. Third, and finally,
if the sustained wail had not ceased yet, was the catharsis, the romantic and
actualized moment in which place could be phantasmagoric. The faces lose their
edge, the postures fade, and the crowd, for a brief second, if that, is left in
awe.
I
arrive at the venue early only to wait on a damp patio with all the other
overly eager concertgoers, impatiently killing time on their phones or offering
speculative set list chatter (for those more knowledgeable fans) to their
friends. Nobody talks to people who had not obviously come to the venue with
them. In this way, there does not appear to be the slightest semblance of a
regular community of attendees at the show.
The venue is a recently renovated
warehouse with immaculate wood floors, several bars, clean lighting, and
colorful realist portraits of legendary bluesmen Howlin’ Wolf. The feel is
definitively sanitizing in a distracting way that makes the venue seem
completely indistinctive to the area. Indeed, the tone for the disorienting
sense of place of the show is set by the sensation of arriving in Pawtucket on
public bus. The three sets of Caucasian students coming to The Met juxtaposed
harshly against the largely Black and Hispanic population of the bus.
I ask around on the line into the
show and among the early arrivers. Everyone is there to see the band. Possible
explanations of this include the relatively steep price discount, and the
distant venue. I meet several
groups in the audience. There is a group of twenty-somethings who came to “see
the Antlers before they blow up”. There is a group of college students that respond
to my question with suspicious body language, indicating a sort pre-emptive
establishment of their authority to be in this place. One replies, “I saw this
band when they played a small little venue by where I live and they put on a
great show. I chilled with the lead singer. Nice guy.”
The audience is now congregated
around the stage. The more aggressive members have secured their spot closer to
the front. I meet a Brown University student, wearing straight-cut jeans,
clunky sneakers. He makes it clear that he is here for the music by proudly
displaying his shirt emblazoned with the name of the opening band, Yellow
Ostrich. “I saw these guys a while ago, and loved their stuff,” he volunteers,
“I came for them more than the Antlers.” Several audience members see his shirt
and gesture derisively.
Shortly after, Yellow Ostrich takes
the stage. The band is anchored by a lanky and youthful guitarist with shaggy
brown hair wearing black Levi’s and a loose flannel shirt. The drummer is
wearing a simple button-down, with self-cropped shorts. The bassist is notably
older and wearing clunky boots, roomy jeans and a black t-shirt. Their songs
are short and relatively homogenous, notably featuring identical mid-song breakdowns.
The lyrics center around slightly personalized “you-subject” clichés. The
guitarist-singer sings proudly but with a self-aware gaze. Meanwhile, the
drummer is clean and upbeat in his playing, driving the songs with ample
floor-tom drumming. The audience displays a blend of apathy, and respectful
curiosity, customary to a modern indie-rock
performance, a genre and musical-cultural milieu in which both bands squarely
fit into. During the more upbeat numbers, there is an upsurge in interest as
manifested in attentive looks especially from the females of the crowd. Females constitute roughly a fifth of
the now 150 attendees. At no point does the rampant texting decline. There is a
noticeable amount of filming of the songs on IPhones, indeed to the point where
several attendees make no direct look at the performance.
After forty minutes their set is
over, and the band migrates over to the door to work their “merch table.” This
maneuver establishes the band as approachable and therefore properly within the
confines of indie rock conduct of non-fame.
During the setbreak, I talk with some crowd members. A student at Providence
College tells me that the band was decent but reminded him of a combination of
several more known acts, or a “derivative version of Vampire Weekend and
Spoon”.
Twenty minutes later, after ample
technical set-up, The Antlers casually take the stage. All are wearing
well-fitted outfits with boots, skinny jeans, and tight-fitting plaid shirts.
All feature a similar hairstyle, although the keys player takes it to its
extreme, with bangs at a length that require him to rescue his vision thrice a
minute with a pronounced hair flip. The band begins with a more unsettling
number, and continues a set peppered with a mix of songs deliberately ordered
to offer an arc in mood.
The audience listens intently,
indeed texting is down and no one talks during the songs or between the songs.
Indeed, the extreme quiet between numbers is a source of awkward tension
noticeable amidst the entire crowd until towards the end when Silberman makes a
joke about it in his banter. The dancing comes in a range, from passive
listening with empty facial expressions to exaggerated head nods, almost
flailing, indicating a visceral receiving of the music. The musicians themselves
move distinctly, with the keys player bobbing similar to a DJ might, while the
auxiliary guitarist rocks, in the literal sense, his guitar violently at
climactic moments.
The music ranges in tone but the
hallmarks are found in the confessional tone and lyrics, the use of long
melodic climaxes, lethargic but steady drumming, and ubiquitous use of the
“wall of sound” technique to add auditory grandeur.
After an hour, the band breaks
briefly and comes back to the approximately 300-person crowd for an encore.
Running a little long, the crowd is visibly worn down by the end of the show.
Nonetheless, this weariness juxtaposes against a steady stream of superlative
declarations about the performance ranging from “what a transcendent
experience” to “that sounded dope”.
The performance, in many ways,
seems to anchor around the paradoxical tendencies of the audience members to
bring certain cultural expectations about the cathartic nature of the music,
with the exclusionary realm of attempting to establish one’s legitimacy in a
setting where knowledge of, or even the production of the music itself, of the
music is seen as indicative of subcultural capital. Throughout the show, many
male concertgoers gave the impression that they seemed to accept the music as a
meaningful enterprise only so far as to maintain it as a vehicle for their own
theoretical advantage. They saw themselves on the stage, and the fashion of the
bands matching the crowd encouraged this belief. Many crowd members, directly
enquired into the specific gear used by the bands. Comments such as the earlier
remark about “derivative” bands, illustrate a proclivity to marginalize the
originality of the onstage performers. It is my analysis that this intense
desire to be the performer of these romantically emotive songs with tender
lyrics, and searing falsettos is to desire to situate oneself as the romantic
center of attention of the room. Indeed the lavish attention poured onto to
Silberman and the keyboardist, confirms this. Many of the audience members, in
more tender moments, noticeably looked around the crowd for enrapt facial
expressions. The lack of any evident community encouraged this notion. At no
point in the show are the conventions about personal space broken or
conversations among strangers abundant. Nonetheless, evidenced by the
superlative commenting, and the momentarily rapt faces, it seems that beneath
the certain audience ego, there is a real connection to the music. Beneath the
fashion aesthetics, people are moved and it is conceivable that it is for this
sensation that people are indeed drawn to these shows.
Word Count: 1,429